Awareness of possible complications associated with direct composite restorations: A multinational survey among dentists from 13 countries with meta-analysis

Lehmann A., Nijakowski K., Jankowski J., Donnermeyer D., Palma P. J., Drobac M., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Dentistry, cilt.145, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 145
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105009
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Dentistry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Communication Abstracts, Metadex, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Composite resin, Dental restoration failure, Permanent dental filling, Questionnaire, Side effects
  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Objectives: Resin-based composites (RBCs) evolved into favoured materials for teeth restorations, marking a significant change in dental practice. Despite many advantages, RBCs exhibit various limitations in their physical and chemical properties. Therefore, we assessed the dentists' awareness of possible complications after direct composite restorations and their opinions about this material. Methods: The online questionnaire was created in English in May 2023. A 16-item survey was dedicated to general dentists and specialists. The first section included four questions related to demographic characteristics. The second section comprised twelve questions and focused on awareness of potential side effects of composite restorations, the most crucial advantages and disadvantages of composite resins, and the frequency of experienced clinical complications after the application of composite materials. Results: A total of 1830 dentists from 13 countries took part in the survey. Dentists most often declared awareness of low adhesion to the dentine (77.5 %) and, most rarely, solubility in oral fluids (42.6 %). Aesthetics was identified as the main advantage of composite fillings (79 %), followed by the possibility of repair (59 %) and adhesion to enamel (57 %). Polymerisation shrinkage was a major disadvantage for most countries (70 % overall). Analysing the declared potential clinical complications for all countries, statistically significant findings were obtained for marginal discolouration (OR=2.982, 95 % CI: 1.321–6.730, p-value=0.009) and borderline significance for secondary caries (OR=1.814, 95 % CI: 0.964–3.415, p-value=0.065). Conclusions: Dentists value aesthetics and repairability but are aware of shrinkage and experience discolouration. The issue of toxicity and solubility seems to be the least known to dentists. Clinical significance: Dentists should use RBCs with critical caution due to possible side effects. Despite the undoubted aesthetics of direct composite restorations, it is necessary to remember potential clinical complications such as marginal discolouration or secondary caries.