Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning, cilt.12, sa.2, ss.848-871, 2024 (ESCI)
Can neighborhood boundaries be defined in terms of morphological and functional
characteristics in cities that have developed different formations due to various
influences in the historical process? While neighborhood units in planned
settlements are pre-planned with an integrative approach, in unplanned traditional
settlements, residences come together as pieces and ultimately form the settlement.
In this study, which was carried out in Antalya-Kaleiçi, qualitative and quantitative
research methods were used. In the study, the neighborhood formation system was
discussed based on the hierarchical structure. A set of buildings including
residences that are next to and opposite a residence and directly open into a shared
urban space is defined as the neighborhood cell of that residence. The functional
relationships among residential elements were defined as neighborhood
connections, and a method to determine neighborhood connection density was
developed. In morphological development, an arrangement involving religious
buildings accepted as focal points, neighborhood cells of different degrees forming
around them, neighborhood blocks of different degrees belonging to neighborhood
cells of different degrees, and neighborhood units formed out of neighborhood
blocks was observed. It is understood that the density of neighborhood connections
is influenced by the number of residences defining neighborhood cells, the number
of connection points between residences such as building doors and gates, and the
spatial sizes of neighborhood spaces in which neighborhood connections take place.
In other words, the tendency for dense neighborhood connections emerges in areas
with more residences and connections but low square footage area. This situation
was considered a reflection of the relationship between the morphological and
functional structures. It was concluded that unplanned traditional neighborhood
units were formed in a way that did not show the self-sustaining and enclosed
character of planned residential units, and this structure was a characteristic that
should be taken as an example and maintained in terms of settlement culture.