There are two different attitudes in our age: 'holding the weak people’s hand' or 'pushing the weak with its hand'. The positioning of people / societies in terms of benefit-harm / struggle-assistance approaches causes different consequences. According to one, the human shoulder is a step / buttress to promote and according to another it is a power source to support and to walk together. In the former, the shoulder is stepped and in the latter the shoulder is given to support. One tries to grow who he has under his hands by showing mercy while the other tries to grow himself by oppressing them. One aims to boost them by holding, but the other aims to go up by stepping on them.  According to one, taking the oppressed by their hands means humanity, but according to another, this is a stupidity. One tries to exploit the geography where he is, but the other tries to construct and vivify the geography where he spares to step.

These two understandings bring out two different people. One wants to be a superior person by crushing the weak and the other wants to be a perfect human-being by supporting them. The Western civilization / savagery is founded / served on aiming to be a ‘superior man’, but the Islamic civilization to be a ‘perfect human-being.’ The effect of the view to the relation among animals is great in the formation of being a superior man.

The Darwinist approach regards animal life as a war and the people who are affected by this approach turn the world into a battle-field. The Darwinist point of view looks at the relationship between animals with regard to benefit-damage. Those who take this view as the basis accept all kinds of inhuman actions in order to be able to dominate the power / energy resources in the world. The relations among people are approached with the view that 'what my profits / earnings are', and the people in need of mercy are seen as parasites / parasites who must be eliminated. The Darwinist understanding suggests that superior races are worth living and existing. Those who accept this understanding consider themselves as the superior race that is entitled to live and turn the life into a hell in various parts of the world. New ones are being added to the oppressed geographies every day and a lot of people waiting for help are left to helplessness, illness and death by condemnation to hunger, misfortune, refugee camps, unsound shelters. The problems / wars / atrocities that the world is facing today are the consequences of Darwinism in great measure.

It is not human that relations are moved away from infidelity and compassion, and are dragged into war. So it cannot be realistic for Darwin and his followers to define nature as a place where living things constantly fight each other. Every being in the universe is carefully placed in the great being plan to create a unique order. If the fight was essential, it would be a chaos rather than cosmos in the universe. However, there is no chaos / confusion but cosmos / destiny / measure. Since a small building cannot be realized without the bricks embracing each other, the magnificent universe building can only come to life with the embracing / fortune / affection of beings. In this paper, Darwinism will be questioned in terms of its effects on human relations