Performance-oriented seismic retrofit of a Cliff-mounted steel–glass observation platform under near-source ground motions: viscous damping strategies and targeted section enhancement
ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, cilt.83, sa.1, ss.1-28, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 83 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jestch.2026.102542
- Dergi Adı: ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), INSPEC, Directory of Open Access Journals
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-28
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Cliff-mounted steel–glass observation platforms may be
earthquake-sensitive because of their slender supports, low inherent damping,
and elevated mass. This study presents a numerical proof of concept for
retrofitting the Oylat Glass Observation Platform in Türkiye with fluid viscous
dampers (FVDs). To the authors' knowledge, and within the literature reviewed,
this is the first reported FVD retrofit study for a freestanding or
cliff-mounted steel–glass observation platform. Three spectrally matched near-source
records from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence were applied
simultaneously in two horizontal directions. Direct-integration
response-history analyses were performed. Four strategies were compared.
Strategy 1 used all feasible external and internal FVDs. Strategy 2 controlled
the columns first and then added deck dampers one at a time. Strategy 3 used
only external FVDs to control the columns. Strategy 4 combined external FVDs
with ring-beam strengthening. In each strategy, Design Methodology II (DM-II)
iteratively adjusted the active damper coefficients using the governing
demand-to-capacity (D/C) ratio. Strategies 1, 2, and 4 kept all audited members
at D/C ≤ 0.80. Their maximum D/C ratios were 0.7991, 0.7820, and 0.7882,
respectively. Strategy 3 met its column-control objective but did not control
the full deck. Its maximum D/C ratio was 2.8292. Strategy 2 gave the lowest
maximum D/C. Strategy 4 gave the most uniform outer-deck displacement. These
results establish a proof-of-concept benchmark for future FVD placement and
sizing algorithms.