Çay Tarımında Makineleşme: Verimlilik Gerçekten Artıyor mu?


Özden E.

Rize Ticaret ve Ekonomi Kongresi, Rize, Türkiye, 22 - 23 Ekim 2025, ss.56-57, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Rize
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.56-57
  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In recent years, sustainable agricultural practices have been promoted not only due to environmental concerns but also with the aim of improving productivity, cost-efficiency, and labor sustainability in rural economies. In this context, tea farming—widely practiced in Türkiye’s Eastern Black Sea Region—has also begun to experience a technological transformation. Particularly in Rize province, the increasing adoption of tea harvesting machines (motorized shears) has attracted attention for their potential to reduce production costs and lessen dependence on seasonal labor. This study aims to evaluate the effects of mechanization on productivity, cost, and labor use in tea farming through both descriptive and causal analytical approaches. Data were collected from 248 tea producers across six districts in Rize. Initially, descriptive statistics and multiple regression models were employed. These analyses revealed that producers who use machinery tend to achieve higher productivity, employ less labor, and lower their cost per kilogram of output. Furthermore, due to potential correlations among the error terms of the three dependent variables, supplementary estimations were conducted using the Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) method. However, in order to determine whether these observed differences stem directly from mechanization or are instead driven by structural differences among producers, causal inference methods were applied. Specifically, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Treatment Effects models were used to match producers with similar characteristics—such as age, farming experience, education level, and land size. The findings indicate that, when comparing producers with similar attributes, mechanization does not create a statistically significant difference in productivity, cost, or labor use. These results suggest that the seemingly positive effects of mechanization diminish when producer heterogeneity is accounted for, underscoring the importance of using causal methods to evaluate the impact of technological change in tea agriculture.