Moving percentage of failed delta checks: a novel patient-based quality control model
Biochemia medica, cilt.36, sa.3, ss.30701, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 36 Sayı: 3
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.11613/bm.2026.030701
- Dergi Adı: Biochemia medica
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Central & Eastern European Academic Source (CEEAS), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.30701
- Anahtar Kelimeler: biological variation, delta check, patient-based quality control, quality assurance, quality control, systematic error
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Introduction: For measurands with a low index of individuality (II), delta check is crucial. If delta percentage change (DPC) values in different patients consecutively exceed the reference change value (RCV), it may indicate an analytical problem. Similarly to moving sum (MovSuM), percentage of DPCs exceeding RCV can be used as a quality control model by comparing it with a certain threshold. This study aimed to develop a novel patient-based quality control (PBQC) model using delta checks and evaluate its performance. Materials and methods: The study was performed at Gazi University Biochemistry Laboratory. The model was tested on creatinine (measured on Advia Chemistry Systems using the alkaline picrate method), with pooled-CVa = 2.5%, CVi = 4.7%, and RCV = 19%. If DPC > RCV, it was counted as a violation, i.e. failed delta check (FDC). The percentage of violations was calculated for every 20 consecutive patients with previous results over the past year. Similarly to MovSuM, when a new result is added, moving percentage of failed delta checks (MPFDC) removes the oldest data and calculates the percentage of violations continuously. Moving percentage of failed delta checks thresholds determined as 35%/30% (for positive/negative direction). After excluding dialysis patients and patients without previous results, and previous results measured with different systems, we applied truncation (truncation limits: < 27 and > 362 μmol/L). The remaining 5484 results were divided into 55 batches. Results: After applying positive and negative errors of 15%, median number of patients affected before error detection (MNPed) was 34 and 29, respectively. Median time until error detection was 18 minutes. Sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 86%, respectively. Conclusions: Moving percentage of failed delta checks, a novel RCV-based PBQC model, has high sensitivity and rapid error detection, suitable for measurands with low II.