Investigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomography


Alkurt M., Duymus Z., DEDEOĞLU N.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, cilt.8, sa.5, ss.380-387, 2016 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 8 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.380-387
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Impression materials, CBCT, X-RAY CT, DENTAL CASTS, TOOTH-SIZE, PLASTER, MODELS, RELIABILITY, DISTORTION, VALIDITY
  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

PURPOSE. The storage conditions of impressions affect the dimensional accuracy of the impression materials. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of storage time on dimensional accuracy of five different impression materials by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Polyether (Impregum), hydrocolloid (Hydrogum and Alginoplast), and silicone (Zetaflow and Honigum) impression materials were used for impressions taken from an acrylic master model. The impressions were poured and subjected to four different storage times: immediate use, and 1, 3, and 5 days of storage. Line 1 (between right and left first molar mesiobuccal cusp tips) and Line 2 (between right and left canine tips) were measured on a CBCT scanned model, and time dependent mean differences were analyzed by two-way univariate and Duncan's test (alpha=.05). RESULTS. For Line 1, the total mean difference of Impregum and Hydrogum were statistically different from Alginoplast (P<.05), while Zetaflow and Honigum had smaller discrepancies. Alginoplast resulted in more difference than the other impressions (P<.05). For Line 2, the total mean difference of Impregum was statistically different from the other impressions. Significant differences were observed in Line 1 and Line 2 for the different storage periods (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The dimensional accuracy of impression material is clinically acceptable if the impression material is stored in suitable conditions.