Morphometric Analysis of the Maxillary Sinus Using CT-Based Air-Cavity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, cilt.15, ss.1-25, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 15
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/jcm15166173
- Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Chemical Abstracts Core, EMBASE
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-25
- Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to
characterize the three-dimensional morphology of the aerated maxillary sinus
using CT-based air-cavity reconstruction and to evaluate its relationship with
selected morphometric parameters, septa characteristics, bilateral symmetry,
and dental root extension.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 125 paranasal computed tomography
(CT) examinations from 61 males, 64 females (mean age 37.04 ± 15.37 years),
corresponding to 250 maxillary sinuses. Three-dimensional air-cavity
segmentation was performed using Mimics software following a standardized
Hounsfield unit-based thresholding protocol. Morphological patterns of the
aerated cavity were classified according to internal compartmentalization and
associated morphological features. Morphometric measurements, including
ostium-to-sinus-floor distance, axial sinus dimensions, multiplanar septal
characteristics, and dental root extension, were recorded and statistically
analyzed.
Results: Unilocular
morphology represented the predominant configuration on both sides (right:
55.2%; left: 53.6%), whereas bilocular and multilocular patterns were less
common. Morphologically more complex configurations demonstrated a higher
frequency of coronal and axial septa than simple unilocular cavities.
Side-to-side differences were identified for ostium-to-sinus-floor distance (p
= 0.050), axial longitudinal sinus length (p = 0.027), and pole
measurements (p < 0.001). Dental root extension was more frequent on
the left side (16.0%) than on the right (6.4%; p = 0.002). Male
participants exhibited greater ostium-to-sinus-floor distances and larger axial
sinus dimensions than females (all p < 0.05), whereas age showed only
a weak negative correlation with left axial transverse sinus length (ρ =
−0.191, p = 0.032). Inter-observer agreement for the proposed
18-category three-dimensional morphological classification was substantial
(Cohen's κ = 0.726 for the right side and κ = 0.717 for the left side; both p <
0.001).
Conclusions: CT-based three-dimensional air-cavity reconstruction enabled detailed evaluation of the internal morphology of the aerated maxillary sinus. The observed variability in morphological patterns, septa distribution, and selected morphometric characteristics suggests that assessment of the aerated cavity may complement conventional morphometric evaluation of the maxillary sinus. These findings provide a descriptive anatomical reference that may support future radiological, anatomical, and computational investigations of maxillary sinus morphology.
Keywords: maxillary sinus, morphometry, anatomical variation,
computed tomography, septa, air-cavity reconstruction