Comparison of <SUP>68</SUP>Ga-FAPI PET/CT and <SUP>18</SUP>F-FDG PET/CT in gastric cancer: impact on metastatic detection and stage migration


Okuyan M., ELBOĞA U., Sahin E.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/bjr/tqag185
  • Dergi Adı: BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO)
  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT in patients with gastric cancer, with particular emphasis on metastatic detection and stage migration. Methods Fifty-two patients with histopathologically confirmed gastric cancer who underwent both 18F-FDG PET/CT and Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Primary tumor uptake, metastatic involvement, and tumor staging were evaluated for each modality. Detection rates for lymph node, peritoneal, liver, and bone metastases were compared. Diagnostic performance and stage migration between modalities were assessed. Quantitative parameters including standardized uptake value and tumor-to-background ratio were analyzed. Results Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher uptake in primary tumors compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT (P < .001). Peritoneal metastases were detected in 30.8% (16/52) of patients on Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT compared with 13.5% (7/52) on 18F-FDG PET/CT (P = .004). Nodal metastases were also identified more frequently with Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT. Both modalities showed high diagnostic performance for liver metastases, while Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated slightly higher sensitivity for bone lesions and 18F-FDG PET/CT showed slightly higher specificity. Overall stage migration between the 2 modalities occurred in 25.0% (13/52) of patients, predominantly due to upstaging associated with newly detected metastatic disease. In subgroup analysis, 18F-FDG uptake tended to be lower in signet-ring cell carcinoma, whereas FAPI uptake appeared less influenced by histological subtype. Conclusion : Ga-6(8)-FAPI PET/CT improves detection of metastatic disease, particularly peritoneal involvement, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with gastric cancer and may contribute to more accurate disease staging.Advances in knowledge This study highlights the added value of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in identifying metastatic disease and altering clinical staging, particularly through improved detection of peritoneal involvement, which may impact treatment decision-making.